Igure S7 Gel analysis results of the predicted putative genes. Gene size of each band was shown in unit of amino acids. The incorrect gene size was marked in red frame. (DOC) Table S1 Velvet assembly statistics.Table S3 Glycoside hydrolases from the enriched thermophilic cellulolytic culture. (DOC) Table S4 Carbohydrate binding modules from enriched thermophilic cellulolytic culture. (DOC) Table S5 Comparison between metagenomic study of cow rumen microbes (10) and this study. (DOC)AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank Dr. Lin Cai for his technical assistance on primer design. Yu Xia and Feng Ju, wish to thank The University of Hong Kong for the postgraduate studentship.(DOC)Table SAuthor ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: YX TZ HHPF. Performed the experiments: YX. Analyzed the data: YX FJ. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: YX JF TZ HHPF. Wrote the paper: YX TZ.Properties of the 10 predicted carbohydrateactive enzyme candidates tested for assembly authority. (DOC)
In 2009, a swine-origin H1N1 virus spread rapidly around the world. The initial outbreak occurred in April of that year in Mexico, and the World Health 25331948 Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic of the new type of influenza A in June 2009 [1]. By November 2009, 199 countries or regions had Felypressin biological activity identified the virus in laboratory. Although the 2009 H1N1 virus (also referred as to swine flu, sH1N1) is antigenically different from previous 374913-63-0 site seasonal influenza A (H1N1) [2,3], there are increasing reports showing possible cross-reactivity of the antibodies to seasonal influenza antigens [4,5,6]. The natural immune response to the 2009 H1N1 has been extensively investigated [7,8], and the status of the antibody against sH1N1 in risk populations before and after the pandemic has been repeatedly reported [9,10]. However, few reports show the changes in seasonal influenza antibodies before and during the pandemic in risk populations, especially in Asia. In this study we conducted a cross-sectional serological survey of four major seasonal influenza types: A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata (B/Y) and B/Victoria (B/V) in March and September 2009, to investigate the seasonal influenza immunity response before and during the outbreak of the sH1N1 influenza. Cross-reactivity between antibodies of 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H1N1 is speculated. Also, comparisons show that the 0? age groupantibody response is distinct from that of all other age groups in that its antibody response increased against all 4 types of seasonal influenza during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic from the pre-outbreak level. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic not only provided a major opportunity to elucidate the mechanisms of a new influenza strain transmission, outbreak and host response, but it also provided a new opportunity to study the mechanisms of the seasonal influenza switches. Such information will be very important for those who decide anti-influenza policy [11].Materials and Methods Geographical Background of the Study AreaShenzhen, a Special Economic Zone opened up in the early 1980s for international trade, is the largest migration city in China. It is adjacent to Hong Kong and is a coastal city in Guangdong Province. Shenzhen has a population exceeding 14,000,000, of which more than 80 is non-residential (that is, the 80 comprises floating people who are working in Shenzhen with temporary resident permits). The mobility and high density of the population enable infectious diseases to be transmitted rapid.Igure S7 Gel analysis results of the predicted putative genes. Gene size of each band was shown in unit of amino acids. The incorrect gene size was marked in red frame. (DOC) Table S1 Velvet assembly statistics.Table S3 Glycoside hydrolases from the enriched thermophilic cellulolytic culture. (DOC) Table S4 Carbohydrate binding modules from enriched thermophilic cellulolytic culture. (DOC) Table S5 Comparison between metagenomic study of cow rumen microbes (10) and this study. (DOC)AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank Dr. Lin Cai for his technical assistance on primer design. Yu Xia and Feng Ju, wish to thank The University of Hong Kong for the postgraduate studentship.(DOC)Table SAuthor ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: YX TZ HHPF. Performed the experiments: YX. Analyzed the data: YX FJ. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: YX JF TZ HHPF. Wrote the paper: YX TZ.Properties of the 10 predicted carbohydrateactive enzyme candidates tested for assembly authority. (DOC)
In 2009, a swine-origin H1N1 virus spread rapidly around the world. The initial outbreak occurred in April of that year in Mexico, and the World Health 25331948 Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic of the new type of influenza A in June 2009 [1]. By November 2009, 199 countries or regions had identified the virus in laboratory. Although the 2009 H1N1 virus (also referred as to swine flu, sH1N1) is antigenically different from previous seasonal influenza A (H1N1) [2,3], there are increasing reports showing possible cross-reactivity of the antibodies to seasonal influenza antigens [4,5,6]. The natural immune response to the 2009 H1N1 has been extensively investigated [7,8], and the status of the antibody against sH1N1 in risk populations before and after the pandemic has been repeatedly reported [9,10]. However, few reports show the changes in seasonal influenza antibodies before and during the pandemic in risk populations, especially in Asia. In this study we conducted a cross-sectional serological survey of four major seasonal influenza types: A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata (B/Y) and B/Victoria (B/V) in March and September 2009, to investigate the seasonal influenza immunity response before and during the outbreak of the sH1N1 influenza. Cross-reactivity between antibodies of 2009 H1N1 and seasonal H1N1 is speculated. Also, comparisons show that the 0? age groupantibody response is distinct from that of all other age groups in that its antibody response increased against all 4 types of seasonal influenza during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic from the pre-outbreak level. The 2009 H1N1 pandemic not only provided a major opportunity to elucidate the mechanisms of a new influenza strain transmission, outbreak and host response, but it also provided a new opportunity to study the mechanisms of the seasonal influenza switches. Such information will be very important for those who decide anti-influenza policy [11].Materials and Methods Geographical Background of the Study AreaShenzhen, a Special Economic Zone opened up in the early 1980s for international trade, is the largest migration city in China. It is adjacent to Hong Kong and is a coastal city in Guangdong Province. Shenzhen has a population exceeding 14,000,000, of which more than 80 is non-residential (that is, the 80 comprises floating people who are working in Shenzhen with temporary resident permits). The mobility and high density of the population enable infectious diseases to be transmitted rapid.
