N in GBM relative to all other forms of glioma. Previous studies have suggested that even slow-growing JWH 133 biological activity benign oncocytoma exhibit high levels ofPyruvate Kinase Modulation in Brain TumorsPKM2 expression, and pre-malignant Barrett’s intestinal metaplasia also exhibited significant PKM2 over-expression [11,31]. It was therefore surprising that benign grade I glioma exhibited levels of PKM2 expression no different from those of frankly malignant grade III glioma, but less than that of GBM. A trivial explanation of this data is that the grade I-III tumor samples, as a result of the diffuse nature of the tumors, contain a larger percentage of normal cells than the grade IV tumors, and that the admixture of normal cells expressing high levels of PKM1 and tumor cells expressing high levels of PKM2 results in a grade I-III glioma sample that appears as a whole to have a lower level of PKM2 expression than its truly tumorigenic components. All samples used, however, were verified by pathologic examination to contain .90 tumor, and even if this explanation were true, mixed samples would be expected to have higher levels of both PKM1 and PKM2, rather than just the increased levels of PKM2 (relative to normal brain) noted. The related question of whether all glioma over-express PKM2 is an open to interpretation and based on the point of reference. Relative to normal brain, all glioma express higher levels of PKM2 and lower levels of PKM1. These tumors, however, most likely did not arise from normal differentiated brain cells and more likely arose from 
a stem or progenitor population [32,33]. Further complicating the matter, each grade of glioma may arise from a distinct progenitor population, and even with a given grade there may be different cells of origin [34]. Nonetheless, the pattern of PKM1/PKM2 expression 23977191 in grade I-III glioma more closely resembles that of NSC population than normal brain. Whether these tumors 298690-60-5 chemical information represent a frozen stage of differentiation or a dramatic shift in metabolic profile remains an unanswerable question. It is clear from the data, however, that GBM represent a unique type of glioma, quantitatively different from the other grades of glioma with respect to PKM2 expression. If GBM exhibit significantly higher levels of PKM2 expression than other glioma, one important question is how this gradespecific up-regulation occurs. A number of genetic events including c-myc over-expression, growth factor over-expression, and Ras pathway activation have been linked to the control of PKM transcript splicing [21,35-38], and the increased incidence of these alterations in GBM may tilt the balance of splicing toward production of the PKM2 transcript and help explain the gradespecific increases in PKM2 expression noted. It’s worth noting, however, that the present study examined both de novo GBM, as well as secondary GBM that arose from lower grade tumors based on their mutant IDH status. The fact that both groups of GBM exhibit increased PKM2 expression despite their very different genetic compositions [39] suggests that the up-regulation of PKM2 in GBM appears to be driven by fundamental processes shared by all GBM rather than by known genetic alterations that play adirect role in the PKM splicing process but differ between the two GBM groups analyzed. The work presented also suggests that modulation of both PKM expression and PK activity are important for continued glioma cell growth. The GBM cells used for these studies were represe.N in GBM relative to all other forms of glioma. Previous studies have suggested that even slow-growing benign oncocytoma exhibit high levels ofPyruvate Kinase Modulation in Brain TumorsPKM2 expression, and pre-malignant Barrett’s intestinal metaplasia also exhibited significant PKM2 over-expression [11,31]. It was therefore surprising that benign 
grade I glioma exhibited levels of PKM2 expression no different from those of frankly malignant grade III glioma, but less than that of GBM. A trivial explanation of this data is that the grade I-III tumor samples, as a result of the diffuse nature of the tumors, contain a larger percentage of normal cells than the grade IV tumors, and that the admixture of normal cells expressing high levels of PKM1 and tumor cells expressing high levels of PKM2 results in a grade I-III glioma sample that appears as a whole to have a lower level of PKM2 expression than its truly tumorigenic components. All samples used, however, were verified by pathologic examination to contain .90 tumor, and even if this explanation were true, mixed samples would be expected to have higher levels of both PKM1 and PKM2, rather than just the increased levels of PKM2 (relative to normal brain) noted. The related question of whether all glioma over-express PKM2 is an open to interpretation and based on the point of reference. Relative to normal brain, all glioma express higher levels of PKM2 and lower levels of PKM1. These tumors, however, most likely did not arise from normal differentiated brain cells and more likely arose from a stem or progenitor population [32,33]. Further complicating the matter, each grade of glioma may arise from a distinct progenitor population, and even with a given grade there may be different cells of origin [34]. Nonetheless, the pattern of PKM1/PKM2 expression 23977191 in grade I-III glioma more closely resembles that of NSC population than normal brain. Whether these tumors represent a frozen stage of differentiation or a dramatic shift in metabolic profile remains an unanswerable question. It is clear from the data, however, that GBM represent a unique type of glioma, quantitatively different from the other grades of glioma with respect to PKM2 expression. If GBM exhibit significantly higher levels of PKM2 expression than other glioma, one important question is how this gradespecific up-regulation occurs. A number of genetic events including c-myc over-expression, growth factor over-expression, and Ras pathway activation have been linked to the control of PKM transcript splicing [21,35-38], and the increased incidence of these alterations in GBM may tilt the balance of splicing toward production of the PKM2 transcript and help explain the gradespecific increases in PKM2 expression noted. It’s worth noting, however, that the present study examined both de novo GBM, as well as secondary GBM that arose from lower grade tumors based on their mutant IDH status. The fact that both groups of GBM exhibit increased PKM2 expression despite their very different genetic compositions [39] suggests that the up-regulation of PKM2 in GBM appears to be driven by fundamental processes shared by all GBM rather than by known genetic alterations that play adirect role in the PKM splicing process but differ between the two GBM groups analyzed. The work presented also suggests that modulation of both PKM expression and PK activity are important for continued glioma cell growth. The GBM cells used for these studies were represe.
