Morphology of individual islets separated by large areas of non-endocrine tissue, can be clearly visualised. C, D Representative sections of pelleted islet (c) and matrigel-implanted islets (d) at one month post transplantation, dual stained with insulin (red) and glucagon (green) antibodies, original magnification 6200, scale bars are 25 mm. E. Total endocrine area in graft sections; n = 4 animals per transplant group, p.0.2, Student’s t test. F. Average individual endocrine aggregate area in graft sections; n = 4 animals per transplant group, *p,0.05 vs. pelleted islet grafts, Student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057844.gislet graft recipients, which we believe is not physiologically relevant. Instead, this is likely to be due to extensive islet cell death [4,5] and subsequent insulin leakage from dying cells during the immediate post transplantation period. The real differences in glycaemia are present at 2? weeks post transplantation when the anatomical remodelling and revascularisation process are known to be completed [17,18]. Matrigel is a solubilised basement membrane preparation extracted from an Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm mouse sarcoma[19], in which the main components are ECM KDM5A-IN-1 proteins such as laminin, collagen IV, fibronectin and perlecan [20]. These basement membrane proteins are involved in interactions between intraislet ECs and endocrine cells [21,22] and a number of studies have suggested that loss of integrin signalling between islets and 
the surrounding ECM proteins is detrimental to islet function [21,23,24]. Conversely, entrapment of islets within ECM scaffolds is reported to enhance islet function [25?9] and survival [21,28,30,31]. In the present study we did not detect anyMaintenance of Islet MorphologyFigure 6. Vascular density of matrigel-implanted islets. CD34 immunostaining of microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) in pelleted islet grafts (a) and matrigel-implanted islet grafts (b) at 1 month post transplantation. Original magnification 6400, scale bars 25 mm. C. Vascular density of endocrine components in 1 month grafts consisting of pelleted (black bar) or matrigel-implanted (white bar) islets. *p,0.05 vs. pelleted islet grafts, n = 4 animals per group, Student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057844.gadditional in vivo benefit of suspending the islets in matrigel over and above the improved function associated with the maintenance of islet morphology by physical dispersion below the renal capsule. This does not imply that islet-ECM interactions are unimportant, but suggests that interactions with the specific matrix components present in matrigel are neither beneficial nor detrimental for islet survival and function in vivo when transplanted to the renal subcapsular site. Thus, the beneficial effects of matrigel in our experimental model can be attributed to its role as a physical support to maintain islet anatomy. There are a number of mechanisms through which maintained islet architecture may have beneficial effects on graft function and transplantation outcome in our studies. Hypoxia-related dysfunction [32] and cell death [4,5,33,34] is an important confounding factor in 
the survival of avascular islets during the immediate posttransplantation period. Oxygen tension gradients across fused islet tissue have been demonstrated previously [35], with higher partial pressures of oxygen at the periphery of the islet graft compared with centrally located parts of the graft. order K162 Diffusion of oxygen and nutrients.Morphology of individual islets separated by large areas of non-endocrine tissue, can be clearly visualised. C, D Representative sections of pelleted islet (c) and matrigel-implanted islets (d) at one month post transplantation, dual stained with insulin (red) and glucagon (green) antibodies, original magnification 6200, scale bars are 25 mm. E. Total endocrine area in graft sections; n = 4 animals per transplant group, p.0.2, Student’s t test. F. Average individual endocrine aggregate area in graft sections; n = 4 animals per transplant group, *p,0.05 vs. pelleted islet grafts, Student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057844.gislet graft recipients, which we believe is not physiologically relevant. Instead, this is likely to be due to extensive islet cell death [4,5] and subsequent insulin leakage from dying cells during the immediate post transplantation period. The real differences in glycaemia are present at 2? weeks post transplantation when the anatomical remodelling and revascularisation process are known to be completed [17,18]. Matrigel is a solubilised basement membrane preparation extracted from an Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm mouse sarcoma[19], in which the main components are ECM proteins such as laminin, collagen IV, fibronectin and perlecan [20]. These basement membrane proteins are involved in interactions between intraislet ECs and endocrine cells [21,22] and a number of studies have suggested that loss of integrin signalling between islets and the surrounding ECM proteins is detrimental to islet function [21,23,24]. Conversely, entrapment of islets within ECM scaffolds is reported to enhance islet function [25?9] and survival [21,28,30,31]. In the present study we did not detect anyMaintenance of Islet MorphologyFigure 6. Vascular density of matrigel-implanted islets. CD34 immunostaining of microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) in pelleted islet grafts (a) and matrigel-implanted islet grafts (b) at 1 month post transplantation. Original magnification 6400, scale bars 25 mm. C. Vascular density of endocrine components in 1 month grafts consisting of pelleted (black bar) or matrigel-implanted (white bar) islets. *p,0.05 vs. pelleted islet grafts, n = 4 animals per group, Student’s t test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057844.gadditional in vivo benefit of suspending the islets in matrigel over and above the improved function associated with the maintenance of islet morphology by physical dispersion below the renal capsule. This does not imply that islet-ECM interactions are unimportant, but suggests that interactions with the specific matrix components present in matrigel are neither beneficial nor detrimental for islet survival and function in vivo when transplanted to the renal subcapsular site. Thus, the beneficial effects of matrigel in our experimental model can be attributed to its role as a physical support to maintain islet anatomy. There are a number of mechanisms through which maintained islet architecture may have beneficial effects on graft function and transplantation outcome in our studies. Hypoxia-related dysfunction [32] and cell death [4,5,33,34] is an important confounding factor in the survival of avascular islets during the immediate posttransplantation period. Oxygen tension gradients across fused islet tissue have been demonstrated previously [35], with higher partial pressures of oxygen at the periphery of the islet graft compared with centrally located parts of the graft. Diffusion of oxygen and nutrients.
