Tributed, 
median 43 
over 10 years; { Not uniformly distributed, median 12 over 10 years; 1 Comprehensive costs, including costs of outpatient visits, additional laboratory tests, laboratory personnel. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059549.tpotentially by identifying a seronegative partner in a serodiscordant relationship or people with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and their partners. Another hypothetical approach could be to randomly assign PrEP to individuals regardless of level of sexual activity in order to avert infections. The drugs used in PrEP regimens are the same as those recommended for first-line Pentagastrin treatment regimens. A critical issue in PrEP use is therefore the development of HIV drug resistance in the population. Potential risks associated with using the same drugs for both prevention and for treatment can be illustrated by the use of nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission [6]. Recent maternal use of nevirapine for prevention of mother-tochild-transmission was associated with a higher probability of virological failure in the mothers receiving nevirapine as part of their first-line regimen [7]. Our objective is to use mathematical modeling to explore the possibilities of daily oral PrEP optimization using realistic data collected in the rural HIV clinic at the Macha Mission Hospital in Zambia. Rural settings such as Macha often face more barriers to treatment, such as large travel distances to clinics and fewer financial resources available [8]. Particularly in these settings, optimized PrEP strategies can be of great additional value from both a public health and economic perspective. We therefore evaluated the impact of hypothetical scenarios in which PrEP is prioritized to individuals with the highest sexual activity or is AN 3199 distributed randomly. We could therefore determine cost-effectiveness at both ends of the PrEP distribution spectrum, from where PrEP is given to those at highest risk of becoming infected, to giving PrEP to individuals regardless of risk. We additionally aimed to evaluate the risk for resistance development.cells/mm3, and at CD4,350 cells/mm3 since 2010. The HIV pharmacy is well-stocked and treatment is readily available for all diagnosed patients who drop below the treatment threshold.Model and AssumptionsA compartmental deterministic mathematical model was constructed and parameters were chosen to represent the Macha setting (Table 1). Our model stratifies disease progression into an acute stage, a chronic stage and two AIDS stages (Figure S1). Two AIDS stages are included because during the final months before death, patients will have limited sexual activity and are therefore assumed not to transmit HIV [10,11]. The acute stage has a duration that ranged between 10 and 16 weeks [12]. The combined 1527786 duration of the acute stage and the chronic stage is 8.5?.7 years [10,13]. The pre-final AIDS stage ranged between 6 and 12 months [10,11]. Compared to the chronic stage, it was assumed that infectivity was 27?3 times higher in the acute stage [14] and 3? times higher in the AIDS stage [10,11] (Table 1). Individuals that test positive for HIV can reduce their risk behavior [15,16,17], largely due to a reduction in acquisition of new partners [15]. Based on recent work done in neighboring Zimbabwe, it is assumed in our model that patients will reduce the acquisition of new partners by 0?0 [18]. Model Description and Validation. Following earlier model’s methods for defining risk s.Tributed, median 43 over 10 years; { Not uniformly distributed, median 12 over 10 years; 1 Comprehensive costs, including costs of outpatient visits, additional laboratory tests, laboratory personnel. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059549.tpotentially by identifying a seronegative partner in a serodiscordant relationship or people with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and their partners. Another hypothetical approach could be to randomly assign PrEP to individuals regardless of level of sexual activity in order to avert infections. The drugs used in PrEP regimens are the same as those recommended for first-line treatment regimens. A critical issue in PrEP use is therefore the development of HIV drug resistance in the population. Potential risks associated with using the same drugs for both prevention and for treatment can be illustrated by the use of nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission [6]. Recent maternal use of nevirapine for prevention of mother-tochild-transmission was associated with a higher probability of virological failure in the mothers receiving nevirapine as part of their first-line regimen [7]. Our objective is to use mathematical modeling to explore the possibilities of daily oral PrEP optimization using realistic data collected in the rural HIV clinic at the Macha Mission Hospital in Zambia. Rural settings such as Macha often face more barriers to treatment, such as large travel distances to clinics and fewer financial resources available [8]. Particularly in these settings, optimized PrEP strategies can be of great additional value from both a public health and economic perspective. We therefore evaluated the impact of hypothetical scenarios in which PrEP is prioritized to individuals with the highest sexual activity or is distributed randomly. We could therefore determine cost-effectiveness at both ends of the PrEP distribution spectrum, from where PrEP is given to those at highest risk of becoming infected, to giving PrEP to individuals regardless of risk. We additionally aimed to evaluate the risk for resistance development.cells/mm3, and at CD4,350 cells/mm3 since 2010. The HIV pharmacy is well-stocked and treatment is readily available for all diagnosed patients who drop below the treatment threshold.Model and AssumptionsA compartmental deterministic mathematical model was constructed and parameters were chosen to represent the Macha setting (Table 1). Our model stratifies disease progression into an acute stage, a chronic stage and two AIDS stages (Figure S1). Two AIDS stages are included because during the final months before death, patients will have limited sexual activity and are therefore assumed not to transmit HIV [10,11]. The acute stage has a duration that ranged between 10 and 16 weeks [12]. The combined 1527786 duration of the acute stage and the chronic stage is 8.5?.7 years [10,13]. The pre-final AIDS stage ranged between 6 and 12 months [10,11]. Compared to the chronic stage, it was assumed that infectivity was 27?3 times higher in the acute stage [14] and 3? times higher in the AIDS stage [10,11] (Table 1). Individuals that test positive for HIV can reduce their risk behavior [15,16,17], largely due to a reduction in acquisition of new partners [15]. Based on recent work done in neighboring Zimbabwe, it is assumed in our model that patients will reduce the acquisition of new partners by 0?0 [18]. Model Description and Validation. Following earlier model’s methods for defining risk s.
