In the buildup of serum-like fluid within the abdomen [9,10]. The rich medium provides support for malignant cells to proliferate and further metastasize despite the lack of matrix substrata, allowing these cells to overcome the apoptosis associated with loss of attachment. This implies that malignant cells and mesothelial cells in ascites up-regulate survival signals in order to persist in the hypoxic but otherwise rich liquid milieu [11]. Thus, ascites is an excellent reservoir for the identification of useful cancer biomarkers, especially in EOC patients [12]. In a study by Kislinger’s group, ascites were separated into cellular and fluid fractions, followed by mass spectrometry analysis of each fraction [13]. While over 2,500 proteins within ascites were identified, only 229 proteins were found in the fluid fraction. After integrated computational analysis of the ascites proteome combined with proteomic data from human plasma and urine microarray data sets and protein rotein Interaction Database I2D, 80 candidate serological PTH 1-34 ovarian cancer biomarkers wereselected for further validation. Kuk and colleagues also carried out proteomic analysis of ascites fluid based on multiple separation and fractionation techniques [14]. A total of 52 proteins were selected from 445 unique proteins in the ascites fluid as good candidates for ovarian cancer biomarkers in future investigations. These authors all found proteomic analysis to be a significant resource for ovarian cancer research and a framework for 1662274 biomarker discovery. To our knowledge, proteomic studies of ovarian cancer ascites are limited, and a comparative study between intrinsic Ornipressin chemoresistant and chemosensitive 
ovarian cancer ascites by DIGE technology has not been previously reported. The findings of our study may aid in the prediction of therapeutic responses and disease prognosis for ovarian cancer patients. Our first aim was to find unique biomarkers just in the ascites fluid and not in the cell fraction as in Kislinger’s study [13]. Thus, we separated the fluid fraction from cellular components for 2D-DIGE by centrifugation. As biomarkers may be present at low concentrations in body fluids such as serum and ascites, one major challenge to performing indepth analysis of proteomes by mass spectrometry is the presence of highly abundant proteins such as albumin and immunoglobulins, which constitute 65?7 of serum proteins [15]. These abundant proteins limit the ionization efficiency during MS analysis, preventing the identification of low abundance proteins. Therefore, depleting the highly abundant proteins by using a 2Dclean up kit was necessary before our analysis in order to detect lowly abundant biomarkers. In our study, a total of 11 differentially proteins were identified between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites. It was not unexpected that some proteins were identified in multiple spots, since many proteins in ascites are known to existBiomarkers for Chemoresistant Ovarian CancerFigure 2. (top) Proteomic analysis of ascites by 2D-DIGE. A representative 2D-DIGE image (merged image) showing the protein profile of ascites of chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer patients labeled with Cy5 (red spots) and Cy3 (green spots), respectively, with an internal standard labeled with Cy2. IPG strips (24 cm, pH 4-7) were used for IEF prior to standard SDS-PAGE (12.5 polyacrylamide) for the second dimension. The molecular weight range in the vertical dim.In the buildup of serum-like fluid within the abdomen [9,10]. The rich medium provides support for malignant cells to proliferate and further metastasize despite the lack of matrix substrata, allowing these cells to overcome the apoptosis associated with loss of attachment. This implies that malignant cells and mesothelial cells in ascites up-regulate survival signals in order to persist in the hypoxic but otherwise rich liquid milieu [11]. Thus, ascites is an excellent reservoir for the identification of useful cancer biomarkers, especially in EOC patients [12]. In a study by Kislinger’s group, ascites were separated into cellular and fluid fractions, followed by mass spectrometry analysis of each fraction [13]. While over 2,500 proteins within ascites were identified, only 229 proteins were found in the fluid fraction. After integrated computational analysis of the ascites proteome combined with proteomic data from human plasma and urine microarray data sets and protein rotein Interaction Database I2D, 80 candidate serological ovarian cancer biomarkers wereselected for further validation. Kuk and colleagues also carried out proteomic analysis of ascites fluid based on multiple separation and fractionation techniques [14]. A total of 52 proteins were selected from 445 unique proteins in the ascites fluid as good candidates for ovarian cancer biomarkers in future investigations. These authors 
all found proteomic analysis to be a significant resource for ovarian cancer research and a framework for 1662274 biomarker discovery. To our knowledge, proteomic studies of ovarian cancer ascites are limited, and a comparative study between intrinsic chemoresistant and chemosensitive ovarian cancer ascites by DIGE technology has not been previously reported. The findings of our study may aid in the prediction of therapeutic responses and disease prognosis for ovarian cancer patients. Our first aim was to find unique biomarkers just in the ascites fluid and not in the cell fraction as in Kislinger’s study [13]. Thus, we separated the fluid fraction from cellular components for 2D-DIGE by centrifugation. As biomarkers may be present at low concentrations in body fluids such as serum and ascites, one major challenge to performing indepth analysis of proteomes by mass spectrometry is the presence of highly abundant proteins such as albumin and immunoglobulins, which constitute 65?7 of serum proteins [15]. These abundant proteins limit the ionization efficiency during MS analysis, preventing the identification of low abundance proteins. Therefore, depleting the highly abundant proteins by using a 2Dclean up kit was necessary before our analysis in order to detect lowly abundant biomarkers. In our study, a total of 11 differentially proteins were identified between chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer ascites. It was not unexpected that some proteins were identified in multiple spots, since many proteins in ascites are known to existBiomarkers for Chemoresistant Ovarian CancerFigure 2. (top) Proteomic analysis of ascites by 2D-DIGE. A representative 2D-DIGE image (merged image) showing the protein profile of ascites of chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer patients labeled with Cy5 (red spots) and Cy3 (green spots), respectively, with an internal standard labeled with Cy2. IPG strips (24 cm, pH 4-7) were used for IEF prior to standard SDS-PAGE (12.5 polyacrylamide) for the second dimension. The molecular weight range in the vertical dim.