Gher than 1:40) in 11 subjects (CHC patients with ongoing treatment, n = 3; CHC patients without treatment, n = 2; IBD group, n = 4 and controls, n = 2). The overall post-vaccination GMT was 124 (95 CI 25?19), representing a 17.9-fold increase from the pre-vaccination level. The post-vaccination GMT was higher in the group of CHC patients than in the IBD patients (229, 95 CI 55 to 957 vs. 60, 95 CI 12 to 307; P = 0.006). However, there were no differences between CHC patients with ongoing buy Nafarelin treatment compared with CHC patients without treatment or controls (Table 3, P = 0.89).Effects of vaccination on virological responseRegarding the impact of 223488-57-1 influenza vaccination on SVR, no significant differences were found between CHC patients receiving standard medical care during vaccination (n = 15) compared to those treated after vaccination (n = 8). In addition, viral load, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values were not different 6 months after the end of treatment (Table 6). The groups were similar regarding prognostic factors of favorable outcome.Table 1. Reasons given for declining 2009 (H1N1) influenza A vaccination.CHC with ongoing treatment, n ( ) Worry about side effects Never receives seasonal influenza vaccine Query on the efficacy of the vaccine Simply did not want the vaccine 1 (100) 0 0CHC without treatment, n ( ) 2(33.3) 2(33.3) 2(33.3)IBD patients, n ( ) 8 (26.7) 6 (20) 3 (10) 13 (43.3)CHC, chronic hepatitis C; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048610.tInfluenza A Vaccine in Chronic Hepatitis CTable 2. Demographic data and baseline characteristics of the participants according to group.CHC with ongoing treatment (n = 15) Gender, female ( ) Age, years BMI (Kg/cm2) Viral load (IU) Genotype 1 and 4, n ( ) Type of IBD, Crohns disease n ( ) 4 (27) 47.469.5 23.463.5 444086154991 11 (73) -CHC without treatment (n = 10) 3 (30) 42.4610.9 23.963.2 148668461866724 9 (90) -IBD patients (n = 32) 17 (53) 36.369.6 24.965.0 27 (84)Controls (n = 15) 11(73) 38.8610.5 22.062.9 -Type of immunosuppression treatment in IBD patients, n ( ) Azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine Methotrexate Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents Hemogram Leucocytes (109/L) Neutrophils (109/L) Lymphocytes (109/L) Hematocrit ( ) Platelets (109/L) Liver function tests AST (IU) ALT (IU) 30614 29621 1126112 2016256 23611 20616 4.062.2 2.361.4 1.160.6 39.364.0 159654 7.161.7 3.461.4 2.960.9 44.063.0 207661 6.261.6 3.961.2 1.760.9 40.564.4 2646117 29 (91) 3 (9) 15 (47) -CHC, chronic hepatitis C; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; BMI, Body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. Mean 6 standard deviation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048610.tDiscussionInfluenza virus infection can cause severe illness and mortality in high risk patients. Annual immunization is highly recommended in elderly subjects and adults 1326631 with chronic medical conditions or immunosuppression, in order to decrease attributable morbidity and mortality. These recommendations were extended to the pandemic 2009 novel (H1N1) influenza A virus [1,2]. Despite these firm recommendations by health authorities, a low rate of vaccination was expected. Indeed public anxiety about the safety of the novel vaccine reported in the media contributed. In fact, one-third of our patients refused to be vaccinated. The main arguments against were doubts about vaccine safety and side effects, and concern over vaccine efficacy. This is in keeping with.Gher than 1:40) in 11 subjects (CHC patients with ongoing treatment, n = 3; CHC patients without treatment, n = 2; IBD group, n = 4 and controls, n = 2). The overall post-vaccination GMT was 124 (95 CI 25?19), representing a 17.9-fold increase from the pre-vaccination level. The post-vaccination GMT was higher in the group of CHC patients than in the IBD patients (229, 95 CI 55 to 957 vs. 60, 95 CI 12 to 307; P = 0.006). However, there were no differences between CHC patients with ongoing treatment compared with CHC patients without treatment or controls (Table 3, P = 0.89).Effects of vaccination on virological responseRegarding the impact of influenza vaccination on SVR, no significant differences were found between CHC patients receiving standard medical care during vaccination (n = 15) compared to those treated after vaccination (n = 8). In addition, viral load, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values were not different 6 months after the end of treatment (Table 6). The groups were similar regarding prognostic factors of favorable outcome.Table 1. Reasons given for declining 2009 (H1N1) influenza A vaccination.CHC with ongoing treatment, n ( ) Worry about side effects Never receives seasonal influenza vaccine Query on the efficacy of the vaccine Simply did not want the vaccine 1 (100) 0 0CHC without treatment, n ( ) 2(33.3) 2(33.3) 2(33.3)IBD patients, n ( ) 8 (26.7) 6 (20) 3 (10) 13 (43.3)CHC, chronic hepatitis C; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048610.tInfluenza A Vaccine in Chronic Hepatitis CTable 2. Demographic data and baseline characteristics of the participants according to group.CHC with ongoing treatment (n = 15) Gender, female ( ) Age, years BMI (Kg/cm2) Viral load (IU) Genotype 1 and 4, n ( ) Type of IBD, Crohns disease n ( ) 4 (27) 47.469.5 23.463.5 444086154991 11 (73) -CHC without treatment (n = 10) 3 (30) 42.4610.9 23.963.2 148668461866724 9 (90) -IBD patients (n = 32) 17 (53) 36.369.6 24.965.0 27 (84)Controls (n = 15) 11(73) 38.8610.5 22.062.9 -Type of immunosuppression treatment in IBD patients, n ( ) Azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine Methotrexate Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents Hemogram Leucocytes (109/L) Neutrophils (109/L) Lymphocytes (109/L) Hematocrit ( ) Platelets (109/L) Liver function tests AST (IU) ALT (IU) 30614 29621 1126112 2016256 23611 20616 4.062.2 2.361.4 1.160.6 39.364.0 159654 7.161.7 3.461.4 2.960.9 44.063.0 207661 6.261.6 3.961.2 1.760.9 40.564.4 2646117 29 (91) 3 (9) 15 (47) -CHC, chronic hepatitis C; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; BMI, Body mass index; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. Mean 6 standard deviation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048610.tDiscussionInfluenza virus infection can cause severe illness and mortality in high risk patients. Annual immunization is highly recommended in elderly subjects and adults 1326631 with chronic medical conditions or immunosuppression, in order to decrease attributable morbidity and mortality. These recommendations were extended to the pandemic 2009 novel (H1N1) influenza A virus [1,2]. Despite these firm recommendations by health authorities, a low rate of vaccination was expected. Indeed public anxiety about the safety of the novel vaccine reported in the media contributed. In fact, one-third of our patients refused to be vaccinated. The main arguments against were doubts about vaccine safety and side effects, and concern over vaccine efficacy. This is in keeping with.